Primordial Light: COMETS
 
Exploring our own back yard.
The comets pictured here would look nothing like these photographs if we could observe them from nearby. They would not be neat round balls and they would be very dark, perhaps nearly as black as soot. The late astronomer Fred Whipple famously described comets as “dirty snowballs” as he hypothesized that they consist of a conglomeration of water ice and very dark, apparently fine-grained rocky material. Whipple was proven correct when we finally got a close-up look at a comet from a spacecraft. In fact, what we are seeing when we “see” a comet is the coma, a cloud of gas and dust that has been boiled off the nucleus—the dirty snowball itself—by sunlight and that surrounds the nucleus before being blown away by the solar wind, the stream of particles emitted by the Sun. If we’re lucky we also see a tail (or two; see bottom photos) formed from the gas and dust. Although the tail seems to be following the comet through space, it will be on the side of the comet opposite the Sun because it is being shaped and moved by the solar wind. Comets are named after their discoverers. Here is a stunning photograph of the spectacular 2007 Comet McNaught made by its discoverer, Dr. Robert H. McNaught, an Australian astrophysicist. Unfortunately for those of us who live north of the Equator, Comet Mcnaught was seen only poorly from northern latitudes.
Comet 17P/Holmes and the star Mirfak on November 13, 2007
This photo was made through moderately dense ground fog in an otherwise good sky. The fog may be seen around Mirfak. A rotational gradient applied in Photoshop causes stars in the coma to be portrayed unrealistically, but emphasizes the jets coming from the nucleus. The star field outside the coma is accurately portrayed.
Comet 17P/Holmes was as obscure as a known comet can be until October 24, 2007. Within a few hours on that day Comet Holmes became as much as a million times brighter than its typical 17th magnitude. It brightened to at least magnitude 3, which made it an easy object for the unaided eye, even in many urban areas where little can be seen in the night sky. The presumed cause of the brightening is a sudden release of a large quantity of gas and/or dust that reflects sunlight back to the Earth. No tail was evident in early photographs.
The fuzzy spot in the center of this December 17, 2007, image is 17P/Holmes’ pseudo nucleus. It is so-named because the real nucleus—the “dirty snowball”—cannot be seen in a telescope from Earth, but the dense cloud of dust an ice particles surrounding it is visible.
Comet 2006 M4/SWAN on October 26, 2006
Comet 73P Schwassmann-Wachmann (Fragment C—I think) on April 29, 2006
I annotated this image after I performed a bit of astrometry—the measurement of star positions and magnitudes—using the Unix astronomy software XEphem because I was curious to know the visual magnitude of the dimmest stars in the image. I captured one star of magnitude 19.19. That is nearly a million times dimmer than the brightest stars that are visible in our night sky. High-contrast processing revealed what may be even dimmer stars, but the magnitude 19.19 star is the dimmest that I can confirm. None of the stars in this image is bright enough to be seen with the naked eye.
 
Comet Hale-Bopp, 1997
 
Comet Hyakutake, March, 1996
One of the most striking features of the comets above is the presence of two tails. Most comets exhibit two tails. One (the blue one in the Hale-Bopp image) is the ion tail —a stream of gas emitted by the comet whose atoms have been stripped of an electron by the solar wind. The other tail is the dust tail.
Observatory